Do Muslims Have a ‘Caste System’ like the Hindus?

Name of Questioner: Sajid

Date: 13-9-2019 08:33:56 PM

Consultant: Ask About Islam Editorial Team

Question:

Respected scholar, In Indian subcontinent Muslims are divided into so many alleged upper and lower casts and adopt the same cast system prevailed in Hindu community. Some Muslims prefix the word SAYYED with their names and claim that they are ancestors of Prophet (peace be upon him). They also declare other Muslims inferior to them. My question is: Does Islam allow cast system in any way? What is the meaning of Sayyed in Arabic language and do Arabs also use this word as cast symbol? Please answer in detail as the Indian Muslim Ulema also recognized casteism directly or indirectly.

Dear questioner,

Thank you for your question.

Answering your question, Dr. Jasser Auda, Professor and Al-Shatibi Chair of Maqasid Studies at the International Peace College South Africa, the Executive Director of the Maqasid Institute, states:

Soon after the passing away of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), Islam expanded and started to mix with various civilizations in unique ways.

These civilizations had their own social structures, which Islam generally accepted, such as specific tribal systems or royal lineages, and so on.

Islam allowed societies to maintain certain social status for certain groups of people based on their lineages and tribes, etc.

Thus, for example, persons who came from certain noble Arabic (prophetic) lineages kept a special status in terms of them not receiving Zakah (annual charity) and perhaps having some special conditions for accepting marriage proposals, and so on.

However, it is essential to note that the Indian Caste System that Muslims had adopted is different from the above. On one hand, it does have a side of it that could be acceptable in Islam, such as honoring certain lineages.

On the other hand, in reality, it is a framework for an unfair social system that goes against the Islamic principles of equality of human beings in general and of Muslims in particular.

Every Muslim knows that God said: {… the best amongst you at the sight of God are the most pious.} (Quran 49:13) The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: "An Arab has no advantage over a non-Arab, a white person has no advantage over a black person, and a black person has no advantage over a red person, except with piety and good deeds." (Al-Bayhaqi)

However, sociological studies on the social structure of Muslims in India have proved the strong presence of descent-based social stratification among them that has serious implications on their quality of life and development, which is un-Islamic! Unfortunately, features of the Hindu caste system, such as hierarchical ordering of social groups and hereditary occupation, are widely present among Indian Muslims as well.

Thus, present day Indian Muslims are those who trace their origins to foreign lands such as Arabia, Persia, Turkistan or Afghanistan,  upper caste Hindus who converted to Islam, middle caste converts whose occupations are 'ritually clean', and converts from the 'untouchable castes', Bhangi (scavengers), Mehtar (sweepers), Chamar (tanners), and so on.

These groups are usually placed into 3 broad categories, namely, 'ashraf', 'ajlaf', and 'arzal'.

1- 'Ashraf' - meaning noble, includes all Muslims of foreign blood and converts from higher castes. In Bihar, U.P and Bengal, Sayyads, Sheikhs, Moghuls and Pathans constitute the 'ashrafs'. In AP - Syeds, Shaikh, Pathan and Labbai are 'Ashrafs'.

Muslim groups currently classified by the Indian Government under the category 'Other Backward Classes' come essentially from the non-ashraf section of the Muslim population. They are converts from the middle and lower caste Hindus and are identified with their traditional occupation. Based on the above, at least 82 different social groups among Muslims were declared amongst the same category.

2- 'Ajlaf' - meaning 'degraded or unholy', embraces the 'ritually clean' occupational groups and low ranking converts.

3- 'Arzals' are the lowest in the caste hierarchy who have converted from 'untouchable castes' of Hindus. They have similar traditional occupations as their Hindu counterparts in the list of Schedule Castes. Conversion to Islam did not bring any change in their social or economic status as they are discriminated amongst Muslims also, which is un-Islamic! Their inclusion –by the Indian government- in the OTHER BACKWARD CLASSES class has failed to make any impact, and because of the stigma attached to their traditional occupation, they suffer social exclusion.

The Indian Government tried –and generally failed- to solve the problem of Muslim OTHER BACKWARD CLASSES via some Affirmative Action regulations in various states.

Therefore, given all the above disadvantages and forms of discrimination amongst Muslims based on their 'castes', the 'Indian Muslim caste system' clearly goes against the Islamic principles and values that Islam views as fundamental, and thus are un-Islamic! Muslims are supposed to take the first step in changing their own stratification of themselves before they ask others not to discriminate against them.

We hope this answers your question.

Keep in touch.